manny4life (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Although the President and his administration touted the whole "WMD" theory, the Republicans and DEMOCRATS did buy into it and allowed the War Iraq to happen. Saddam was a bastard, but he was our bastard, he was once with the CIA, and Rummy did shake his hand...so the question remains: Instead of blaming the left and right, why don't we blame the entire government? People unite, get angry, get up, and go do what your Founding Fathers would want you to do. Its time for a new Government for us.

karlmahlmann (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

It's a shame that the news media is so tainted. Thank you for putting this bit of history in perspective. Halting nuclear proliferation is one of the biggest challenges of civilization (not changing the Earths climate). Iraq will not be the last time we may need to use force to keep nukes out of the hands of maniacs.

rceceIica187 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Then they say Dems supported the war with the same intel that Bush had. FALSE. Bush used Doug Feith (Jew-Ideologue working for Rumsfeld in the Pentagon) to twist intel, uncorroborated assertions from the Iraqi National Congress that were later proven to be false, and "selected" information from the CIA and foreign agencies to "cobble" together a "story" as predicted by the Downing Street Memo: "fix the intel around the policy". Deluded Neocunts propagandize using this bullshit.

rceceIica187 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Classic. The neocunts find a black man to spread their propaganda. Classic atwater/rove tactic. But those with a college education and some experience in "critical reasoning" will recognize the flaws in the TACTIC. The righties use "dated" information that shows Saddam had WMD many years ago. They purposely IGNORE that the justification for INVADING IRAQ WAS - "IMMINENT THREAT"! WMD's from the 90's DO NOT REPRESENT AN IMMINENT THREAT.

blujesus (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Colin Powell, February 2001: "[Saddam] has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbors. So in effect, our policies have strengthened the security of the neighbors of Iraq." Condoleeza Rice, July 2001: "We are able to keep his arms from him. His military forces have not been rebuilt."

EasyEs (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

No nation can be an island there. They were not total isolationist. Support Israel or not your still scum to those Islamo fascists. Fuck they murdered thousands of Palestinians after the first gulf war.

EasyEs (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

How is it theft again? Also what is wrong with an Israeli being happy about Saddam being removed from power? I mean it isn't like he engaged in two wars against them, rained missiles down on civilian populations, paid terrorists to kill their civilians, named their nuclear reactor after the month when the Babylonians broke the walls of Jerusalem. No total shock as to why he is happy. Keep this up I enjoy feeling much smarter then you.

EasyEs (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Right but you mentioned Milosevic and European oil pipeline I don't see how they are connected to Israel. If this plan goes through as opposed to the Turkish pipeline which is already under construction I would be shocked. What is your point. Oil bought on an open market getting shipped to another country which used to be sworn enemies. How is this bad again?

EasyEs (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

What oil pipeline are you talking about from where? When was it planned? I think you are very incorrect about this. Lots of places are mineral rich my friend the former Yougo is nothing so special as to warrant an international bombing under the guise of stopping ethnic cleansing.

EasyEs (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Okay now are these numbers new orphans or ones hold over from the Saddam days. What is the age range. I can not make sense of these numbers with out that data because it seems very high.