soccerhorse99 (October 8, 2008 at 12:58 am)

this was soo retarded!! But very catchy my teacher made us watch it... yeah i agree waaaay to old..

abellerox (October 8, 2008 at 12:28 am)

omfg that wass soooo retarded but veryy ccatchy my teacher made us watch it we wayy too old though

juanchonsboca (October 7, 2008 at 4:59 pm)

It´s an amendment to bee,!! (8)

TheRealCanadianBill (October 7, 2008 at 4:04 am)

This helped me finish my homework. =D

MassCityGent (October 7, 2008 at 2:08 am)

That's a reasonable view, but it's also irrelevant here, because the bill DID start in the House--it just didn't start as the bailout. The Constitution expressly authorizes the Senate to amend revenue bills that originate in the House just as the Senate can amend any other House bill in their possession (i.e., that the House has already passed and sent to them). That's why the ultimate vote in the House wasn't "on final passage" but "to concur in the Senate's amendments."

italianditz15 (October 6, 2008 at 11:21 pm)

this brings back good saturday memories

franklin216 (October 6, 2008 at 10:44 pm)

In support of the view that the House has the sole power to originate appropriation bills, it has been noted that at the time of the adoption of the Constitution the phrase ``raising revenue'' was equivalent to ``raising money and appropriating the same.'' 62-1, The Supply Bills, S. Doc. No. 8

LMONEYYYY (October 5, 2008 at 5:51 pm)

i love this one helped on my homework i had tonight hahaa

1972awe (October 5, 2008 at 1:56 am)

This is GREAT!!! Wow, really brings back memories of watching Saturday morning cartoons...

allisonazn90 (October 5, 2008 at 12:57 am)

ouch!!! no no no no no!!! heehehheh