|
JSSTyger (October 10, 2008 at 2:07 am)
If wonder if that government swayed the votes in Florida in 2000. Was Jeb Bush in on it?? Hmm
BrooklynNY1992 (October 8, 2008 at 8:57 pm)
That's crazy ahaha I never heard of something like that.
plumcrazypurp (October 8, 2008 at 3:28 am)
actually, a small town in vermont (i cant remember the name) has passed a city bill to arrest george bush on sight for crimes against the constitution, if he ever enters the town that is.
GO2NU8 (October 4, 2008 at 9:00 pm)
The New World Order is here my friend . Help to get the news out Buy Bill boards signs to post the 911 truth .
adrenaline9 (October 4, 2008 at 8:38 pm)
you people must not get that theres is no way to impeach bush. This elaborate plan was too complicated to just be thought of and executed by bush. This was the entire government that was working on this. Bush was merely the puppet used by the rest of the government because of the fact he is the actual president. So impeaching bush is not the answer nor, is it possible. The only thing that could stop it would be for the citizens to take the matters into their own hands and creat a mutiny.*sigh*
BrooklynNY1992 (September 30, 2008 at 7:44 pm)
Could someone arrest George Bush and the FBI already? Geez...
SplitMySkin (September 21, 2008 at 4:59 am)
"guess" this code. Further, the required hardware to communicate with the Pentagon's missile shield system is only installed on certain military planes. Commercial jets do not possess it. This leaves two possibilities: somebody ordered the missile shield to stand-down, or Flight 77 was outfitted with highly restricted military hardware and provided with disarm codes.
SplitMySkin (September 21, 2008 at 4:55 am)
Possibly the most damning evidence is in regards to the Pentagon. The Pentagon has been called the most defended structure on Earth. Its airspace along with that of the greater D.C. area is highly restricted. Specifically regarding the Pentagon, it is guarded by multiple automated batteries of surface-to-air missiles. In order for a plane NOT to be automatically shot down by this missile shield, it must transmit a disarm code within a small time frame. There is absolutely no way anyone could
SplitMySkin (September 21, 2008 at 4:49 am)
flight controllers were described as being extremely difficult, within the abilities of only the most elite jet pilots, involvement at high levels by defense industry men with ties to remote-piloting technologies, no physical evidence of hijackers, bogus recordings, planted evidence (suitcase), and much more. Every avenue of this cover-up must be investigated and the truth must be exposed.
SplitMySkin (September 21, 2008 at 4:45 am)
There are a number of theories, I'm not speaking for the theory espoused by NufffRespect or 911Truth or anyone, but it appears that all of the involved men are/were CIA assets. Now there are basically 2 theories from here: some of them actually did hijack the planes and die OR the planes were hijacked via remote control. The remote control theory holds much more water for a few key reasons: the official hijackers could not fly, they could not pilot commercial jets, the maneuvers recorded by |
