sowhatsthatthere (October 11, 2008 at 2:11 pm)

Employees at the WTC reported strange noises, like moving heavy equipment, in the floor above their office prior to 911. When one employee went to investigate there was nothing there. They heard the noise in their time frame but the activity that caused the noise occured at a different time. Teller to Reagan: The greatest threat to mankind comes from space itself.

sowhatsthatthere (October 11, 2008 at 1:57 pm)

They probably detected time anomaly in advance of 911 so they knew something was going to happen. Hard to fire at a target if you're not in the same time frame. I would try to get my defenses out of harms way ...the drills. The lawn damage occurs days in advance. The video date shows the following day. The debris pattern is out of chronological order. There is conflicting data as to the exact time of impact. Seismograph doesn't record impact, only electrical interference. Not surpising.

lijebaley01 (October 11, 2008 at 1:26 pm)

I just thought that the need to account for the missing matter prompted the development of the string theory, but perhaps I assumed this to begin with, and all my exposure to it was based on this preconception, skewing my perception. I see the need to reinvestigate.

sowhatsthatthere (October 11, 2008 at 1:13 pm)

My understanding of string theory is that the extra dimensions are needed to account for the missing (dark) matter as well as the forces we detect/measure but can not observe with the naked eye.

lijebaley01 (October 11, 2008 at 12:45 pm)

Doesn't the string theory account for all that missing matter without needing extra dimensions?

sowhatsthatthere (October 11, 2008 at 12:37 pm)

Lagasse and Brooks don't talk with each other about what they've just witnessed even though they are coworkers....even for 5 years after 911. Time anomaly is not recorded in their conscious mind. The mind classifies it as a subconscious event rather than conscious....to the world of quantum rather than Newtonian. Belonging to the world of dreams.....the conscious mind feels no compelling reason to talk about it.

lijebaley01 (October 11, 2008 at 12:36 pm)

And am I to assume you have an accurate descent rate for that last couple of seconds? You can have an average descent rate of 3980 for the last couple of minutes. But it doesn't mean the decent rate wasn't much slower for the last 5 seconds or so.

TeleCumber (October 11, 2008 at 12:08 pm)

Working backwards from the impact point based on descent rate of 3980 fpm The aircraft was 87' above the impact point elevation. We need to be at 46' to hit the top of the pole as noted above. Conclusion: Working backwards from the impact hole based on the elevations, speed and descent data, the aircraft is still too high to hit pole #1. 41 feet too high to be exact. 87-46 = 41. Keep in mind this has nothing to do with the altimeter indication aside from descent rate.

TeleCumber (October 11, 2008 at 12:08 pm)

Pentagon impact ground elevation - 33'MSL Light pole 1 elevation - 39'MSL Light pole length - 40' Total MSL height at pole - 79' MSL (top of light pole) Total difference in height working backwards from impact to top of light pole 1 - 46' (79-33=46'). Distance to pole 1 - 1,036' Speed - 781ft/sec at :44 (with speed trend 784ft/sec at :45 impact time) Descent rate - 3980 fpm or 66 ft/sec 1,036/784 = 1.32 seconds 1.32 seconds*66ft/sec = 87.12 feet at that point in time.

lijebaley01 (October 11, 2008 at 11:51 am)

Ahhh, that would explain why it was at 300 feet when it took off.