|
fergieprs (September 7, 2008 at 6:48 am)
+1000 Clapton's tone here is just so bad,it's almost unlistenable. It's a shame because Bruce and Baker (esp Baker) sound really good. Clapton's playing is good, but that tone is horrid! Plus, where's the wah-wah? This was a signature wah tune.
sabbath6663 (September 6, 2008 at 8:48 pm)
he is 69 now so he was 66 back in '05
Hexenschuss007 (September 6, 2008 at 5:46 pm)
funcking great! awesome!
cream for live! simply the best! and the solo, g.r.e.a.t.
redhat123456789 (September 5, 2008 at 10:19 pm)
freakin amazing for a bunch of geezers
modernway91 (September 5, 2008 at 8:08 pm)
jack bruce his voice changed a lot!:O not nice, he was excellent with Cream in his prime
Cirqueduguitar (September 5, 2008 at 2:49 pm)
Eric was helping his mates out with these shows, they needed a cash infusion is my guess. Clapton is the man, but doing these shows without a Gibson with PAF's and a Marshall is WRONG! Its hard to listen to without that sound. But he is Clapton and he can do what he pleases eh guvneh?
jbslegend (September 3, 2008 at 6:56 pm)
hey guys whats age gotta do with it? its not age that counts its ATTITUDE. look at ozzy,look at lemmy, dio. all out there giving it everything as much as ever. not saying cream sounded bad, theres just an aura of disinterest and lack of motivation, especially from clapton who has spent too many years in M.O.R heaven. as for jack bruce. dont get me wrong. i still love them - i just want them to turn the FIRE up! you know?
raitisfreimanis (September 2, 2008 at 11:00 am)
Hey, these old guys still know how to rock!
halobattle360 (September 1, 2008 at 5:54 pm)
well u cant blame clapton for his band performance because he was sick at the time. I beleive it was the flu or something like that
maxmckinley96 (August 31, 2008 at 9:14 pm)
Come on, man! Think how old they were! Ginger was certainly not looking as good as he used to, he must have been in his 60's then... so they did pretty darn well. But you can't the original Cream... |
