|
AirHendrix91 (June 24, 2008 at 9:12 pm)
No, because WMP10 is god. Resistence is futile.
Plus WMP11 takes up way more memory. The press/play buttons are screwed up. The layout of everything got flip flopped.
And WMP10 was easier to read :D.
paulgreenfields (June 24, 2008 at 1:26 am)
How the hell can you say that 11 is worse than 10. That's like saying you were smarter and stronger when you were 10 years of age than when you were 11. See? Doesn't make much sense, does it?
AirHendrix91 (June 10, 2008 at 3:43 pm)
WMP 10 is awesome. 11 is so bad. Bad starting times, the interface blows, and the whole URGE B.S. is crap.
DRiPPz6800 (June 8, 2008 at 1:34 pm)
i think windows media is great and easy to use unlike itunes
cuz itunes is icrappy
ethen24 (June 5, 2008 at 2:58 am)
Window Media Player 11 on Windows Vista! ^^
Titch1977 (May 24, 2008 at 6:42 pm)
I am sorry but I personally could never really get on with Win Amp, I always thought it's UI was cluttered and somewhat complicated! Two things missing from WMP, Ipod support and RSS support. Other than that I think M$ have got it pretty much bang on.
Jr4594 (May 23, 2008 at 8:57 pm)
i get the same white pixels, i just turned on classic menus
acemillenium (May 23, 2008 at 7:05 pm)
when making a highMAT audio cd, it seems to just ignore my list and alphabetically orders all my songs which sucks...
Is there any way to sort the music list in a highMAT audio cd?
80amnesia (May 12, 2008 at 11:52 pm)
wmp 11 is good, way better than 10
RMary (April 28, 2008 at 1:31 pm)
I goofed or did I, upgraded media player and now its horrible.. How and wher can I go back to good one im using Xp windows...
thanks if you can help.
Rose |
