|
djFrend (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
What disgusting perversions the US government is capable of. Sort em out Obama.
Aaberg123 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"an extraordinary rendition program is necessary for the extraordinary circumstances we live in today."
Ahh, just like Hitler needed the KZ camps due to the extraordinary circumstance of having Jews living in his country. He saw them as a threat to Germany.
Does the term "slippery slope" mean anything to you?
notonyourlifewillit (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
ALIEN AGENDA THEY CAN REPLACE,U YOU GET KIDNAPPED AND NO ONE KNOWS YOUR MISSING, THERE ARE ION ACCELERATORS ON OUR NEW COURT HOUSES LIKE THE MARK O HATFIELD BUILDING IN PORTLAND OR.IDENTICAL TO FERMI LAB IN CHICAGO, GOOGLE EARTH PUT IN MARK O HATFIELD BUILDING 3RD AND SALMON SW.TAKE A LOOK AT THE TECHNOLOGY ON THE ROOF OF THIS BUILDING, TRY AND CAPTURE IMAGES OF THIS BUILDING AND SEND IT TO ANYBODY, YOU WONT BE ABLE TO. THESE BUILDINGS ARE PORTALS, TROJAN HORSES YOU GET REPLACED AND END UPinjail
CommanderUTube (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
In the name of national security,a security apparatus could be given blanket power to do anything without accountability to society.
The danger is that what if perverts have infiltrated such an agency and start to perpetuate a program to abuse people for the sake of it.
It could happened to anyone.
In the last days of the old Roman Empire,the Praetorian Guards in Rome did just that and held the Emperor and families captive.
What happens if CIA is infiltrated? It is too horrible to...
Rockguitarnow (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Anyone obstructing or intefering with federal lawsuit work is committing a federal offense and faces five years in federal prison. This includes any kind of harassment, the blocking or delaying of emails, interfering with internet service or computer operation, spreading slander or defamation to impede the lawsuit investigation or lawsuit work, and similar.
ChemicalAlarm (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I've seen him do it on other ACLU vids, it's called "slagging": Just making the same disparaging complaints whether relevant or not.
ChemicalAlarm (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Quit slagging, if it's not relevant, it doesn't belong here as a comment.
y760nitro (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
stupid idiots
ACLU: We misread US v Miller, and we're sticking by our incorrect interpretation of the 2nd Amendment.
Excerpt:
The ACLU interprets the Second Amendment as a collective right. Therefore, we disagree with the Supreme Court's decision in D.C. v. Heller.
massspectrician (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Jeppesen provided auxiliary services with knowledge of acts these services supported. I, for one, have a problem with people profiting (with my tax dollars) from such deplorable acts aimed at marginalizing due process of law conventions. Legally, I think the ACLU will need to show that Jeppesen knew what the CIA was doing to be compromised.
antiwar100 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Ok, I am a legal idiot, but why can't the ACLU, or the grievanced individuals sue the U.S. government? Isn't going after Jeppesen, like going after a delivery boy for the Mafia? |
