|
1973MaseratiBora (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Oh no no no the educational opportunity I'm definitely grateful for, and I'm working hard to take advantage of it. It's a good school and I'm glad I get the chance to earn a degree here, but the people and their philosophies and attitudes towards life are unbearable. I got into several other schools that are just as good if not better than BYU, but I was forced by my unreasonable parents to go here. Wanna trade?
myway43 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I would absolutley love to be at BYU right now. I only wish it could happen. Be thankful that you can be there right now. Be thankful for this great opportunity. You get out of it what you put into it.
minorityFILMS (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
myway43,
You summed it up perfectly. BYU students are like 5-year-olds begging for a cookie from the Mommy University.
myway43 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
They were allowed to protest. They're permit had expired at 1:00 P.M. End of story. I am sure the same policy is upheld for all. As for the concerned persons here, they seem to want to push the limits of what the University will allow. Kind of like when a 5 year old pushes to get a second cookie when his Mother already said he could just have one.
muldurag (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You could have just summed it up, "Getmethere" do you need me to get you to the constitution so you can read it? Don't bother arguing logically with these people, we should argue non-sensically like they do.
rammergramps (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
and i wonder why am an inactive member of the church
1973MaseratiBora (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I'm a sophmore at BYU right now. I fucking hate this place soooo much.
slacker97068 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
only in america the 'FREE'
GetMeThere1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Furthermore, paradoxically, it wouldn't matter very much whether the university was public or private. In each case you have a business arrangement, under contract. As a practical matter, the public university is limited AT THE START: they couldn't force students to sign a contract saying they had to go to church every week--while the private school could. But as far as behavior BEYOND the contract, the legal issues would be the same in either case: one party can't change the rules of the game.
GetMeThere1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
unless the student signed on for that sort of extreme limitation of behavior, no court would find that the university could take the student's money and then ARBITRARILY demand the ability to limit the student's otherwise legal rights so grossly.
Simply, no entity can take significant amounts of money and THEN unilaterally declare a set of heavily restrictive (and unexpected) rules on behavior. It wouldn't pass any kind of "fair contract" ajudication. |
