ali79711 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

lolz:d

NoGuff (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"He is your President elect and in Jan he will be our President. Better" --You've finally turned on your brain and reasoned as an adult. I'm happy for you. But will it stick?

jglin2001 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

No sense in talking to you. I guess you didnt get the meaning of Obama is your President. Once again taking everything literally. OK let me rephrase it for you. He is your President elect and in Jan he will be our President. Better?

NoGuff (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"Obama is your President" --Not sure what nation you live in, G.W. Bush is my President.

jglin2001 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

OK you know what. You are 100% right and I am wrong. OK happy now. I mean damnit. I didnt even vote for Obama or Mccain because all politicians are full of it. Just when I heard his speech and used that expression I didnt even think of Palin. So suck it up Obama is your President. I am not a "Liberal" Because I say something doesnt classify my me as a Liberal. I guess if that is the case your are a literalist. Take everything at face value. Enjoy Obama you Literalist.

NoGuff (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"out of context" --What? I took it in perfect context, then showed you were wrong, then you CHANGED the wording meaning of your message, now I'm taking it out of context? What kind of Liberal double-talk NewSpeak bullshit is that? What a child! "Obama is my President" --Not sure what nation you live in, G.W. Bush is my President. "ill-timed" --No, perfectly timed, just totally out of line. "But did you" --Just pointing out, AND CLARIFYING FOR TRUTH, the situation it's implications.

jglin2001 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

OK I shoul;d have said "many of your cohorts" Another example of taking something out of context. I sit corrected on the "registered voters" Yet, the bottom line is. Obama is my President and your President. If you think Palin had what it takes to lead this country than that is a shame. His comment might have been ill-timed becaue of what Palin had said. But did you want to focus on what possibly might have been an attack on her or focus on the problems effecting you and me both. So good luc

NoGuff (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"All your Republican cohorts still voted for him" --Really? All of them? Let's see.... According to the latest info, although I don't totally agree, of all registered voters, membership in the Democratic Party is 56% and the Republican Party has 43%. Obama won with a 53% popular vote. Now, tell me how you're not talking out of your ass with that one?

jglin2001 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

OK You know what. Fine, he made the comment and out of the clear blue he figures, lets take a jab at Palin. That being said. All your Republican cohorts still voted for him. So either they really dont believe he was referring to her and/or they knew she was not VP or possibly President material. And by-the-way, same goes to you about making a choice of seeing what you want to see. You want to be angry because your party had nothing else to discuss.

NoGuff (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"If thats what you get from the statement as an attack on her than Oh well nothing else can be said" --That's the typical Liberal tactic of ignoring facts and reason. If you don't see that as an attack on her, then you are making a choice to not see it. You know it was. "He never said Palin once while making thaty speech" --Does he need to? Obviously no. "He was talking policy=lipstick on a pig not Palin=lipstick on a pig" --And he just happen to think of that little joke? Out of the blue?