oversoulseven7 (August 7, 2008 at 1:50 am)

When will it be?

refan75 (July 17, 2008 at 9:34 am)

god the damn thing looks like it could fly! i agree with nelli0t tho becouse horses sounds like a WAYY better suloution

nelli0t (July 16, 2008 at 10:06 pm)

what happened to riding horses? ... at least then EPA would have something to do ...

mrboxleytheonly (July 13, 2008 at 6:38 am)

you know it doesn't collect most, yea maybe for like a day's use it would be that efficient, you would need to refill it a lot faster than most cars, and it's speed is not efficient with the amount of power it takes to move something, like an 18 wheeler, good luck with that..

sb6lb3 (July 13, 2008 at 4:01 am)

mr box that is an absolute lie. steam engines, if recirculating the steam, were reaching an efficentcy of of almost 40% thats much higher than the 25% of the cars today

7div (July 12, 2008 at 1:28 am)

If only steam cars had over 100 years of developement like the petrol engine cars.

mrboxleytheonly (July 7, 2008 at 12:10 pm)

well yea, but they are not as efficient as gas cars. Yea they can go fast, once, then you have to stop, and refuel, yea it's cleaner, yea it was fast, but it takes too much to do so little you know?

Haakon45 (July 7, 2008 at 4:48 am)

we havnt gotten much faster since 1906 id say steam power cars are a write off dont you?

sb6lb3 (July 7, 2008 at 2:32 am)

i read this car on some website i will not name. i frown on this car. 100 years ago, steam car such as the stanley steamer and great doble could attain these speeds with RECIPROCATING ENGINES! this thing has a turbine, it dumps the steam back out and can barely reach its speed. the doble steam car can reach 120 100 years ago and is probably around the efficentcy of cars today. not to mention it was a aerodynamic disaster and weighed like a ton. i frown on this car

D0M1N8R1x (July 6, 2008 at 9:04 pm)

Amazing.. 128MPH in 1906 and 100 years later we are going to try to break that by 40-50 MPH.. LoL