|
thelmasss (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I really like the song
and .. come on .. is only a word ¬¬ that express a feeling
Professortibbetts (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
a song that would never have got airplay anyway, buried on a b side of a single, why's it newsworthy?, tv short of news that day??
STEPASAUR (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
yanks.. gotta love 'em, savagely f*(% the world over then gasp at anyone using the wrong fork, p.s this comment doesn't apply to decent, switched on american,x
NorthernMermaid (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
wow oh wow mtv sux big time.
beatleslovee (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Oh get a life, you can ban a song that swears that is about the environment? But you can't ban any of the sex centered songs that they do play? Get a life MTV and K-rock.
splatfacebrainsmell (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
WHAT THE FUCK? This is a sick bit of spin, very sick. 'Canned' defence - everything this reporter says is poison.
He publicised an ENVIROMENTAL song and they slate it to death saying it's a song that 'WILL SELL' like he's all about the money. What a bunch of cunts. 18 years later and americans still watch this shit - is this fox or what?
Youngandwilde (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
lol! i was going to post some comment on that! XD "Fucks News" oh yeah, he did! XD
chibomato78 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i dont see what the big deal was...... i dont think it was ever obscean in the first place
leia176oo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Yes, Fox 5 is a NYC station now owned by Rupert Murdoch, if that tells you anything.
CleRoyster (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
It's not a flipping hole in these media guys head,...it's a fuckin' hole. Mate.
Was this a New York station? Journalism 101 , they missed it. |
